This has gone from a law school blog to a college football blog, but WTF.
College football needs a playoff system. Now it's just embarrassing. I don't know what mountain needs to be moved to make this happen but someone needs to move it. I think it should be the NCAA. They are the only governing body here who appears to be in any position to effect this necessary change. Here are my global thoughts:
Why do we even need a champion or a ranking system? This is actually a much better question than it seems. Why can't competition on the field of play be good enough. Who says that people are entitled to know who's the best team at any point during the year or even at the end of the year? Oh, I know, every competition culminates in a championship. So is the answer to the question simply, "tradition?" Arguably, the conference championships supply the sport with it's needed champions, albeit with and without a title game. Why does it need to extend beyond that? Why can't there be something innocent and magical about College Football that transends the need to have a clear cut Top 25? My answer is, "I don't know." But I'll leave these questions to others because selfishly I want a champion just like everyone else.
The effect of the current system: When you have a National Champion crowned using the current system the competition extends to programs that don't even play each other on the field. We go from having a competition involving a game, two teams of 11 and a field measuring 100yds by 33yds to a competition between programs that resemble corporations more than they do football teams. In this way Florida is competing against Michigan. Louisville is competing against Wisconsin. It's about politics and whether more people watch TV in the Southeast than the Midwest. It's about how many luxury boxes your stadium has and how good the food is in the press box. It's about how many rich alums contribute to the program, how nice the locker rooms are and whose coach has the better on-camera presence. It's about all these things because when there's no clear evidence as to who's ranked No. 2 or No. 13 or No. 117, the voters have nothing else to look to. And the only clear evidence exists between the sidelines.
The solution: First of all, the NCAA needs to come in and take control of the situation. They need to take a "my way or the highway" approach. Some teams may decide to go their own way or form their own governing body. That would be tragic. It would be like the NFL and the AFL co-existing, but worse. As long as the NCAA had the top 40 programs on board everyone else who matters should follow suit. After everyone is signed up with the NCAA, the very next thing is to cut the total number of Div. I-A teams from its current 119 schools to around 60 or so. This eliminates the "Boise State factor." Gone would be teams like Akron, Miami (Ohio), Fla. Int'l, Ball State, Buffalo, Eastern Michigan, North Texas, etc. Next would be to dictate that every conference would either have a title game or not. Presumably not since with a playoff each week is precious. Once all of these poser schools are eliminated there would only be the following conferences: Big 10, Big XII, Pac 10, ACC, Big East, SEC and maybe one other conference that doesn't exist yet to cover any stragglers.
Playoff format: There would be a sixteen team playoff. Each conference champion gets an automatic bid. They can use whatever combination of polls and computers they want to select the other teams. This creates the situation of bubble teams and "Selection Sunday" and whatall like they have for the basketball tournament. Some worthy teams are not going to make the playoffs. At least it would be teams 17-20 and not 3-5 who are on the outside looking in like it is now. Final exams at most universities occur during the first 3 weeks of December. That would mean that this past weekend would have been the end of the regular season if 2006 was the first year of my system. The first round of the playoffs would be the weekend closest to Christmas every year (can't you just see new traditions being born?!). Higher seed has homefield except for the semifinals and final. That means for calendar years 2006-2007 there would be college football playoff games Dec. 23rd and 30th and Jan. 6th and 13th. That only puts the season one week longer than it is now, gives three weeks off for final exams (assuming the NCAA would want to recognize this farce), would allow for the same number of regular season games as there are now and could move the last weekend of the season to Thanksgiving weekend instead of the weekend after to either give the players an extra off week or ending the playoffs a week earlier.
The Bowls: No one should expect the purveyors of college football bowl games to go quietly into the night. Here's how they would be preserved: all of the teams who did not make the playoffs would be eligible for bowl bids. The second tier bowls would happen anytime between the end of the regular season and the end of the playoffs. Each playoff game would be a bowl. The different bowl games would rotate being the quarter finals, semis and final. Under my system there would be 15 playoff games. There's way fewer than 15 first-tier bowls as it is so there's some room for negotiation here. The non-playoff bowls would resume being what they started off as: a reward for the team for a successful season and an exhibition of sorts at a site that normally doesn't have access to DI college football.
The Loot: Everyone knows the main reason why the current scab bag of a system has been allowed to exist - money. If you can solve the money issue then you solve the whole thing. The biggest problem is that there are a lot of people who have their hands in the pot: the NCAA, conferences, individual universities, bowl game producers, television networks and there are probably others. The first and most obvious problem is that teams who make the playoffs and go deep would stand to earn a humongous payday while those who missed the playoffs would have none. This is where the NCAA steps in. Since there are only 60 or so teams in Div. IA, meaningful sums can be redistributed to all member universities by the NCAA according to a predetermined shedule. Obviously, the team that wins the championship should have a much larger payday that the other finalist, the semifinalists and so on so that the incentives remain in place.
A playoff system would not necessarily bring in more revenue because the interest level is already about as high as can be expected. There would be more revenue in any system where it simply adds more games to the schedule, but more games aren't necessary if the regular season is cut by two games. So we could be talking about the same amount of money on the table, with the same people getting it as now. So we're not talking about the whole plan hinging on someone who currently makes a ton of money off the current system to simply walk away just because the fans want a better system. The only difference is the oversight and management by the NCAA, which is probably already happening to a degree. In short, everybody wins.
Recent Comments